As to your play [Tatyana Repina], I try in vain to
see why you speak so ill of it. Its defects do not spring from
your not being sufficiently talented, or from your not having
great enough powers of observation, but from the nature of your
creative ability. You are more inclined to austere creation,
which was developed in you by extensive reading of the classic
models, and by your love of these models. Imagine your Tatyana
written in verse, and you will see that its defects will take
on a different aspect. If it were written in verse, nobody would
notice that all its characters speak one and the same language,
nobody would reproach your characters for uttering nothing but
philosophy, and for "feuilletonizing" in the classic
form--all this would blend with the classic tone as smoke blends
with the air--and one would not observe in your Tatyana
the absence of the commonplace language and the everyday, petty
actions that the modern drama must provide in plenty . . . .
Give your characters Latin names, attire them in togas, and you
will get the same thing--the defects of your play are irremediable
because they are organic. Console yourself with the fact that
they are the product of your actual qualities, and that if you
gave these qualities to other playwrights, their plays would
become much more interesting and clever.
Back to Anton
Chekhov
¹ Anton
Chekhov, Letters on the Short Story, the Drama and other Literary
Topics, selected and edited by Louis S. Friedland (New York:
Minton, Balch & Co., 1924), pp. 170-80. |